Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Crash the SM City Council - Tue July 8th  (Read 1743 times)
mihai
Member
Fixed tandem tricycle with a blind navigation monkey
*****

Karma: +10/-9
Posts: 259

hungry hip hop junkie in the city


View Profile WWW
« on: July 05, 2008, 02:33:14 AM »

Fellow Cyclists,
 
Santa Monica City Council is taking public comment on the current Land Use and Circulation Element (L.U.C.E.) draft.  So let's tell them what they need to hear: We need more consideration for cyclists!
 
With your participation, we can send a message to the powers-that-be that Santa Monica needs more than just a few more bike lanes: we need a connected network of bikeways, blue-striped bike lanes for greater visibility (as in used in Portland, Oregon) and dedicated bike boulevards where cyclists ran ride at speed without fear of motorized traffic.
 
Join us!
 
Tuesday, July 8th
7:30 Meet @ the BikeRoWave.
Ride to City Hall @ 8:00 P.M.

 
Peace & Love,
Jon Luskin
Logged

steveby3
Swing bike
***

Karma: +5/-16
Posts: 184


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 05, 2008, 01:08:19 PM »

is there somewhere online we could read the draft so we could for better comments?
Logged

JB
Member
SUpeR MOLTEn LavA Bicyz
*****

Karma: +62/-69
Posts: 1,398


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2008, 04:32:07 PM »

Yes:

http://www.shapethefuture2025.net/
http://www.shapethefuture2025.net/PDF/luce_docs/LUCE_Acknowledgements_TOC.pdf
Logged

Alex Thompson
Director, A-Division, HULK Laboratories
Global Moderator
SUpeR MOLTEn LavA Bicyz
*****

Karma: +160/-188
Posts: 1,550


HULK SMASH


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: July 05, 2008, 09:30:38 PM »

Getting super specific - the bike recommendations begin on page 83 of this PDF . . . also I'll be reiterating some talking points on my blog.

http://www.shapethefuture2025.net/PDF/luce_docs/LUCE_Chapter_2.pdf
Logged

I'm never in a hurry, I'm just movin fast" - Eagles of Death Metal

http://www.BikesideLA.org/
http://twitter.com/AlexBCT
http://flickr.com/photos/alexbct/

Bikerowave Co-founder, Member of the Board of directors, Treasurer.

steveby3
Swing bike
***

Karma: +5/-16
Posts: 184


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 07, 2008, 03:15:36 PM »

I'm gonna try to show up.. but this plan actually seems to be pretty good for biking.

If we're just going to be complain about critical mass crackdowns though I don't really want to be part of that.

oh and:
Quote
Policies
T12.1 The City shall actively support the extension of the Exposition Light Rail line to Downtown Santa Monica, with a preferred alignment that accommodates an at-grade station in Downtown Santa Monica.

and
Quote
T12.7 The City shall support a future Westside Subway extension or “Subway to the Sea” as a desirable project

 Afro Afro Afro Afro

and
Quote
Goal T16: Continue to provide a safe environment for all road users.
Policies
T16.1   The City shall continue to manage automobile speeds on boulevards and avenues to ensure comfort and safety] for other roadway users.
Cool Cool Cool


Logged

Alex Thompson
Director, A-Division, HULK Laboratories
Global Moderator
SUpeR MOLTEn LavA Bicyz
*****

Karma: +160/-188
Posts: 1,550


HULK SMASH


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: July 07, 2008, 04:02:33 PM »

I'm gonna try to show up.. but this plan actually seems to be pretty good for biking.

Jeez dude - do your research.  No one is going to talk about Critical Mass.  Moreover, this is a DRAFT plan, yet to be approved by City Council.  We can ask them to strengthen it, or if we do nothing, they may well weaken it.  Moreover, my explicit purpose at the last three meetings was to as the Council to begin  implementation of the elements NOW, now 2 years from now when they finally adopt the draft plan.
Logged

I'm never in a hurry, I'm just movin fast" - Eagles of Death Metal

http://www.BikesideLA.org/
http://twitter.com/AlexBCT
http://flickr.com/photos/alexbct/

Bikerowave Co-founder, Member of the Board of directors, Treasurer.

steveby3
Swing bike
***

Karma: +5/-16
Posts: 184


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: July 07, 2008, 04:41:54 PM »

Well I  went through and read it and it seemed good although it's just a policy document so it's probably making a lot of lofty claims that may or may not be filled (something that us cyclists should be holding them accountable for).  So I'm just wondering, are people going to show their support or what. If there are problems with it, what are they, etc. Are those not a valid concerns?

I mean I'm kinda bummed that it's evidently going to take them two years to approve a 100 page document but whatever, government is slow.
Logged

Alex Thompson
Director, A-Division, HULK Laboratories
Global Moderator
SUpeR MOLTEn LavA Bicyz
*****

Karma: +160/-188
Posts: 1,550


HULK SMASH


View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: July 07, 2008, 04:50:26 PM »

It is just a policy document.  However, this policy document will carry a good deal of weight when it is finalized.  It's the product of 3 years of intense community outreach and has been the main project for the Planning Department Director for a couple years now.  So, it has unusually strong backing for such a document.

The main problems with the biking recommendations is that they don't substantially address the issue of enforcement.  We all know how dangerous entitled motorists are, and they simply don't set any policies forth to deal with that issue.  That means cycling will continue to be, and continue to be perceived as, dangerous - so it's pertinent and should be addressed.  A secondary issue is a lack of strong language promoting cooperation between the city and cycling orgs and activists.

However, mostly the document is ok.  The biggest issue is - like you say - the slowness.  We can see this plan be partially implemented at a snails pace for the next 20 years.  Or we can push the City Council each and every day to begin implementation of the bike recommendations now, before they approve the plan.  That's the message I'm trying to carry to them, along with the implicit message that cyclists will be engaged in the City Council election process in November.
Logged

I'm never in a hurry, I'm just movin fast" - Eagles of Death Metal

http://www.BikesideLA.org/
http://twitter.com/AlexBCT
http://flickr.com/photos/alexbct/

Bikerowave Co-founder, Member of the Board of directors, Treasurer.

JB
Member
SUpeR MOLTEn LavA Bicyz
*****

Karma: +62/-69
Posts: 1,398


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: July 07, 2008, 05:10:05 PM »

Let's encourage them to implement this more quickly by using the argument that it's going to be better for Santa Monica as a whole over the next few years.

E.g. Santa Monica has largely escaped the sub-prime housing correction of the past couple of years due to the demographic make-up of the Westside.  The same is not likely to be true, however, of the Alt-A / Option ARM crisis that will occur as the bulk of these mortgages reset in 2010-2011 (see  http://doctorhousingbubble.com/, etc., for more info), as these mortgages were offered to a more affluent level of homebuyer. 

In order to avoid major corrections and maintain home values, communities are going to have to take steps to make themselves more usable by everyone.  If people can ride city streets with their children in safe bike lanes, or shop easily on foot or by bicycle, knowing that unsafe drivers will be ticketed and that the city's support for non-car travel is growing, they will be more likely to remain in that community, rather than fleeing for cheaper, more family friendly suburbs elsewhere.  This keeps home prices up, property tax revenues flowing in, and the community generally pleasant to live in.

The alternative, in which cars remain dominant, and Santa Monica gets absorbed into the surrounding sprawl, home prices and the associated property tax plummet, and people begin to bail rather than riding it out, is an ugly one for cyclists, homeowners, and city government combined.
 
Cycling, it's good for the WHOLE community.  That's the argument I think we should push.

The sooner these things are implemented, the sooner Santa Monica avoids becoming the Inland Empire part 2. http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/laland/2008/07/analyst-sees-gh.html#comments (OK, that's a tad overdramatic, but there are significant benefits to non-cyclists from implementing this plan, and some big costs for not implementing them.)

A few thousand dollars worth of sharrows/lane markers/signs/concrete/etc. will benefit the city by orders of magnitude more than the cost of the minor additional infrastructure.
« Last Edit: July 07, 2008, 05:12:02 PM by JB » Logged

steveby3
Swing bike
***

Karma: +5/-16
Posts: 184


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: July 08, 2008, 08:52:36 AM »

well shit, I wanted house prices to crash so I can afford one someday...
Logged

Elizabeth Hunter
Member
Swing bike
*****

Karma: +8/-8
Posts: 164


View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: July 08, 2008, 10:21:59 AM »

I know, me too.
Logged

JB
Member
SUpeR MOLTEn LavA Bicyz
*****

Karma: +62/-69
Posts: 1,398


View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: July 08, 2008, 10:57:48 AM »

Believe me, a few bicycle lanes are no match for the laws of economics.

Making the city bike friendly will be good long term, but the correction will be hitting the Westside with a vengeance over the next couple of years.

Have you seen the shacks selling for over a million bucks?  Yeah, that's TOTALLY sustainable.

I swear, the funniest thing about L.A. is being not even remotely able to afford a home that I would still be embarrassed to show to my friends from out of state.

Logged

Alex Thompson
Director, A-Division, HULK Laboratories
Global Moderator
SUpeR MOLTEn LavA Bicyz
*****

Karma: +160/-188
Posts: 1,550


HULK SMASH


View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: July 08, 2008, 01:42:00 PM »

JB,

I'm a big fan of the economic angle.  Problem is, I've never found myself with an audience where I thought it was the best sell.  It's also hard to get across in your allotted two minutes.

I can set you up for it, if you like.  Are you going?
Logged

I'm never in a hurry, I'm just movin fast" - Eagles of Death Metal

http://www.BikesideLA.org/
http://twitter.com/AlexBCT
http://flickr.com/photos/alexbct/

Bikerowave Co-founder, Member of the Board of directors, Treasurer.

JB
Member
SUpeR MOLTEn LavA Bicyz
*****

Karma: +62/-69
Posts: 1,398


View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: July 08, 2008, 01:53:25 PM »

Not sure yet.  I don't know when I'm going to be out of the office, but I'm going to try.
Logged

steveby3
Swing bike
***

Karma: +5/-16
Posts: 184


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: July 09, 2008, 01:57:00 PM »

hey, I couldn't make it

how did it go?
Logged

Pages: [1] 2
Print
 
Jump to: